Question 1 3 points Save Answer Note - this question is hypothetical and does not accurately reflect the tools being designed by Apple and Android. The year is 2022. In response to a global pandemic of a disease called COVAL-22, the two leading mobile phone services, Orange and Robot, teamed together to create an efficient and effective contact tracing program, called COVWHO. COVWHO is included in an operating system update for all Orange and Robot users and is designed to run in the background without notifying individuals. Users can "opt out" if they navigate to their security settings. COVWHO works by using location data and Bluetooth to determine individual locations and proximity to other devices. When individuals test positive for COVAL-22, public health officials advise them to update their status in the COVWHO program which automatically sends an alert to all Orange and Robot mobile phone users who have been detected in their proximity in the past 14 days. This notice directs the users that they have been exposed to COVAL-22 and encourages them to quarantine for 14 days and self-monitor for symptoms. The Centers for Disease Control are looking for better ways to limit the spread of COVAL-22 so that they can loosen social distancing restrictions and let more people return to work. As a result, they demand Orange and Robot turn over all COVWHO records so they can better oversee contact tracing and enforce quarantines for people who have been exposed. Apple and Orange turn over the data and the CDC starts enforcing mandatory quarantines on all individuals who have been near confirmed COVAL-22 cases. Gertrude is an Orange user and installs the update containing COVWHO to her phone. After the update is complete, she clicks "I agree" to the new terms of service explaining the addition of the COVWHO program and how to opt out. She does not read the terms of service. Gertrude does not receive any other notification that COVWHO is installed, is not asked to opt in, and does not have any knowledge that she is sharing her location data. A few weeks after installing the update, she gets a notification on her phone which states the following: YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED TO COVAL-22. DATE OF CONTACT: April 15, 2022 You should quarantine until at least April 29, 2022 and self-monitor for symptoms of COVAL-22. If symptoms develop, contact your health care provider. A few days later, a CDC official (using the data from Orange) comes to Gertrude's home and gives her an order to quarantine. Gertrude does not believe in COVAL-22 and declines to quarantine. She goes to a protest against the new United States face-mask mandate and is arrested for failing to quarantine. Gertrude is charged with a federal crime for failing to quarantine. Gertrude's attorneys argue that the case should be thrown out. What is their best argument? O The FTC should investigate Orange. They shared Gertrude's data without properly notifying her in violation of her privacy rights. O The CDC demanded that Orange and Robot turn over location tracking data to the CDC without a warrant. Under Carpenter (the case about using cell tower tracking data from Module 3) the Supreme Court established that a warrant is required for government access to this type of data. Since the quarantine order was based on the improperly obtained location data, the case should be thrown out. O Gertrude is out of luck. There is no argument that can help her here since she voluntarily turned her data over to Orange when she installed the COVWHO program. O Gertrude has a right to be forgotten under UK law. While she is not in the UK, this law protects any data that transits through the UK. Since Orange operates in the UK (among many other global locations) they should have complied with the right to be forgotten law before turning over any data to the CDC