Question $1$

Suria Sdn Bhd held its AGM on $30$ November $2023.$ Notice of the AGM was sent to the

members on $20$ November $2023.$ Only three members $($out of a total of $50)$ and two non$-$

members turned up for the meeting. The two non$-$members attended as proxies of two

other members. The chairman of the board of directors, who presided at the meeting,

proceeded to conduct the meeting, despite protests from Joe $($a director as well as a

member$).$ Among other things, the following resolutions were passed $($with Joe abstaining

from voting$)$:

i$)$ A resolution to remove Joe as a director

ii$)$ A resolution to alter the company's articles of association.

Joe wishes to challenge the validity of the said resolutions on the following grounds:

That the meeting itself was not valid because the notice was defective and there was

a lack of quorum.

That the proper procedure for his removal as a director as well as for the alteration

of articles had not been followed.

Required:

Advise Joe on his chances of success.

$($You may assume that the Articles of Association of Suria Sdn Bhd are in the form

of Table A of the Third Schedule of the Companies Act $2016).$