QUESTION 17 Using the facts in question 16, will cautious Clare be able to establish the element of Actual Cause? O A. Yes. "But For" Large Mart's failure to remove the snow and ice, Clare would not have been injured B. No LargeMart's breach was only the proximate cause of Clare's injury OC No. Causation is not required in Negligence OD None of the choices QUESTION 18 Using the facts in question #16, assume a witness testified for Clare that he had tried to enter the store the day after the storm and suffered a twisted ankle on the ice and snow at the entrance. The witness also testified that he notified Large Mart's manager of his injury and the manager told him the store had been sued one year earlier by 3 individuals after significant snowstorms and the store had paid out settlements Will Cautious Clare be able to establish the element of Proximate Cause? O A No because her injury was not foreseeable to LargeMart B. No because her injury was her own fault She should have used greater caution Yes, because her injury was foreseeable to LargeMart given the manager's knowledge of the possibility of injury at the store entrance through the earlier claims, settlements paid out, and notice regarding a witness's own similar injury D. None of the choices above OC