Question 19: Please show the work that gave you the answer so I can understand- if the answer is provided in less than an hour and half I will assure to send a glowing review and upvote.

Stephen Stigler determined in 19?? that the speed of light is 2993105 krnfsec. In 1832, Albert Michelson had collected measurements on the speed of light ['Student t-distribution,' 2013}. Is there evidence to show that Michelson's data is different from Stiglei's value of the speed of light? Match the type I and type II errors in this case' consequences of each error type for this situation. and appropriate alpha level to use with their correct determinations (not all determinations will be used!). Type II error Type I error consequence Type II error consequence Type I error Correct level of significance ("alpha level'} or to use for test DDDDD . p g 299? 10.5 kmy'sec when it actually does :1 = 299? 10.5 kmr'sec when it actually doesn't A scientists would think their measure of the speed of light is not correct {when it actually is} and thy might expend resources on a search fora different measurement that is actually not necessary. A scientists would think their measure of the speed of light is correct {when it actually is incorrect], and they would stop looking for a better value. Inaocuracy would then enter into any later calculations using the measured [but incorrect] speed of light A a=0.10 A a=0.05 A a= 0.01