QUESTION $2(25$ Marks$)$

Ethics is related to the ability to identify right and wrong actions and to critique wrong decisions and the

accompanied outcomes in order to learn lessons from them. Identify at least one person or group of persons

whose unethical actions led to the escalation of service delivery protest in the case study. Discuss the

Kantian ethical implications of their decisions or actions.

$-$ Introduction $(2$ Marks$)$

$-$ Identification of persons $($public servants or politicians$)$ responsible who did things wrong and what they did

wrong

$(4$ Marks$)$

$-$ Clear articulation of what they did wrong and how it escalated service delivery protests $(7$ Marks$)$

$-$ Kantian examination of the implication of the wrong decisions $(10$ Marks$)$

$-$ Conclusion $(2$ Marks$)$