Question $23$

$1$ pts

Competency $12.$ Jake took his car to Fast Paint to have the car painted. Jake showed Fast Paint the exact shade of blue he wanted the car painted. The car was painted very professionally but it was not exactly the shade of blue Jake wanted. It was close but not exactly right. Fast Paint said it did the best it could. Jake does not want to pay Fast Paint. A judge states that Fast Paint "substantially performed" the contract. that means

Fast paint did not breach the contract and is entitled to be paid in full less a reasonable set off since the color was not perfect.

Fast Paint breached the contract and is not legally entitled to be paid.

Fast Paint can recover all the money for its work under a quasi contract theory. It owes Jake nothing.

Fast Paint did not breach the contract and is entitled to full payment. It does not have to give any money back to Jake as a set off.