Question $24$

$2\mathrm{.}5pts$

Billy enjoys taking his nine$-$year$-$old son Bob to the famous "Redneck Yacht Club" mudding event every year. This year he decides to let Bob drive his large four$-$wheeler, which was legal despite Bob's age because the event was held on private property $($although children riders, as distinct from drivers, were banned in the rules of the event$).$ Bob loses control of the fourwheeler and crashes, which hospitalizes another rider named Buck. Buck wants to sue and recover damages for his hospital bills and the wages he missed at work. How should Buck proceed?

He should sue Billy, as parents are always responsible for their children's tortious actions.

He has no legal recourse, as the actions took place on private property where it is legal for children to drive four$-$wheelers.

He should sue Billy, as Billy negligently allowed a child to drive a four$-$wheeler at a crowded event.

He should sue the event managers for allowing children in the venue.

He should sue Bob, as Bob caused his injuries.