Question 2 Review the ACM Code of ethics which was discussed in the class and use it to analyze the issues in the case studies provided below. You are advised to identify/ mention which clauses of ACM are in direct or indirect violation in these case studies. Please, justify your answer with appropriate justification Case Study-1) An internal website development team wants to perform a usability test on a website using internal and external participants in equal proportions. The ethical issue revolves around whether the consent form designed for external users should also be used for the internals. Some members of the usability team argue that the terms of employment are sufficient to require internals to participate others argue that the purpose of consent is to ensure that participants understand why they have been asked, what is going to happen, what data will be collected and how it will be used, and that they are free to cease participating at any time. Given that the company paid for usability testing and given that the employees have agreed to work for the payment company, however, is the employee free to leave the test? a) Do you agree with the opinion that the consent form designed for external users should also be used for the internals? b) Assuming that the company forced the employees to participate in the test, is there any tenets of ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct that the company has violated. Identify which tenets are involved and explain the relevant ethical consequences. (Case Study-11) Diane recently started a new industry research job, joining the interactive technologies team. In graduate school, her advisor had collaborated with several members of the team on a number of research projects, involving and highlighting Diane's contributions whenever possible. The team had been impressed by Diane's work and recruited her as she was approaching graduation Max, the team's technical leader had built a reputation as a brilliant yet mercurial expert in augmented reality. His team's contributions were highly cited within the field, with Max typically claiming primary authorship as the team leader. Their work was also highlighted frequently in popular press, always with quotes only from Max. Despite the team's repeated successes, Max would erupt with verbal and personal attacks for even minor mistakes. He would yell at the person and berate them in internal chat forums. On multiple occasions, women team members have found their names removed from journal manuscript submissions as punishment. Diane soon found herself the target of one of Max's tirades when she committed a code update that introduced a timing glitch in the prototype shortly before a live demo. Infuriated, Max refused to allow Diane to join the team on stage. Feeling Max's reaction was unprofessional and abusive, Diane approached the team's manager, Jean Jean agreed that the experience was unpleasant, but that was the price to pay for working in an intense, industry-leading team. Jean's advice to Diane was to "Grow up and get over it