Question 28 (5 points) Saved Which single "Cause" should be addressed as the highest priority? Cause Number of Defects Number of Defects Cumulative 80 Percent (%) Percent (%) Cumulative 64.0 80 16 640 96 12.8 76.8 12 108 9.6 86.4 Poor Design Wrong Part Dimensions Defective Parts Incorrect Machine Calibration Operator Errors Surface Abrasions Defective Material 7 115 5.6 92.0 4 119 3.2 95.2 976 3 122 2.4 3 125 2.4 100.0 Defective Parts Poor Design Plagiarism Checker... I untitled report boit myBCIT 08 dnb=0 (306) - jasme.. BCT BCIT :: Sign In RM Walmar ne Left:1:13:16 Jasmeet Kaur: Attempt 1 TIILUTELL Ivialille valli ALUI II 4 119 Operator Errors Surface Abrasions Defective Material 3.2 95 3 122 2.4 97 3 125 2.4 100 Defective Parts Poor Design Operator Errors None of the above - this chart is completed incorrectly Wrong Part Dimensions Question 29 (5 points) Question 29 (5 points) Based on the table from question 28, and considering your answer to the previous question, why would yo address that cause as the highest priority? None of the above - the chart was completed incorrectly Lowest percentage of causes It actually does not matter (no impact) which Cause is addressed first Accounts for most of product defects, which will result in greatest benefit if fixed first Our costs will decrease the most Question 30 (5 points) Saved Based on the table from question 28, what is the percentage of defects attributed to the highest priority "Cause"? 125% 100% 64% None of the Above 2.4% 80%