QUESTION 29 Questions 29 and 30 are based on the following: Henry was an employee of Quantum Industries. The Quantum Industries' employee handbook stated in pertinent part: "No employee shall be terminated except for good cause." Henry was called into his supervisor's office one Friday afternoon and told by his supervisor that there was good cause for firing Henry due to his insistence on wearing a MAGA (Make America Great Again) hat everywhere even when a customer told him that wearing a hat indoors was offensive. The supervisor asked Henry to explain himself, but Henry could not say anything but "I promise to try harder, please don't fire me!" The supervisor landed Henry a check and told Henry it was his final paycheck and to vacate the premises immediately. No one else was present during this meeting. Henry sued Quantum Industries for wrongful employment termination What is Henry's best argument in favor of his wrongful employment termination lawsuit? A One customer's complaint is never sufficient for a termination based on good cause. B. Wearing a hat indoors should not be good cause for terminating an employee. Henry's supervisor did not provide Henry with an opportunity to explain himself D. The customer is not always right