Questions $29$ and $30$ are based on the following: Henry was an employee of Quantum Industries. The

Quantum Industries$$ employee handbook stated in pertinent part: $$No employee shall be terminated except for

good cause.$$ Henry was called into his supervisor$$s office one Friday afternoon and told by his supervisor that

there was good cause for firing Henry due to his insistence on wearing a MAGA $($Make America Great Again$)$

hat everywhere even when a customer told him that wearing a hat indoors was offensive. The supervisor asked

Henry to explain himself, but Henry could not say anything but $$I promise to try harder; please don$$t fire me$!$

The supervisor handed Henry a check and told Henry it was his final paycheck and to vacate the premises

immediately. No one else was present during this meeting. Henry sued Quantum Industries for wrongful

employment termination.

$29.$ What is Henry$$s best argument in favor of his wrongful employment termination lawsuit?

A$.$ One customer$$s complaint is never sufficient for a termination based on good cause.

B$.$ Wearing a hat indoors should not be good cause for terminating an employee.

C$.$ Henry$$s supervisor did not provide Henry with an opportunity to explain himself.

D$.$ The customer is not always right.

$30.$ What is Quantum Industries$$ best argument in defense of Henry$$s wrongful employment

termination lawsuit?

A$.$ One customer$$s complaint is never sufficient for a termination based on good cause.

B$.$ Wearing a hat indoors should not be good cause for terminating an employee.

C$.$ The customer is not always right.

D$.$ Henry$$s supervisor provided Henry with an opportunity to explain himself, but Henry was unable to

do so$.$