Question $32$

$1$ pts

Mel's Donuts, Ltd$.,$ lured several fry cooks away from Sinkers, Inc. with a promise of higher pay, strictly as a maneuver to undermine Sinkers, Inc.$\text{'}$s production capacity, as Mel never intended to pay the cooks more. When they reported to their new job, Mel's denied making the promise of higher pay. With confirming evidence, a court would most likely find that Mel's has violated.

the job as property doctrine

employment$-$at$-$will

implied covenant rules

implied contract rules

no laws, as no written contract was signed