Question: Question 4 1 ( 1 point ) Saved Under the doctrine of respondent superior, a corporation can be held liable for acts perpetrated by its
Question point
Saved
Under the doctrine of respondent superior, a corporation can be held liable for
acts perpetrated by its market competitors.
breaches of contract by its customers and suppliers.
torts committed by its agents or officers.
none of the choices.
Question point
Saved
Todd forms Shell Company to assume debts that he does not wish to pay. The firm is not intended to make a profit, and Todd does not provide it with sufficient capital.
This most likely warrants
tricking Todd into disclosing Shell's true purpose to Todd's creditors.
recognizing Shell as a de facto corporation.
piercing Shell's corporate veil.
requiring Todd to commingle his personal funds and Shell's funds
Question point
Saved
Oliver own Freight Company. He uses the firm's funds to pay his personal expenses, creates Go Go Trucking Inc. to engage in the same business, transfers Freight's assets to Go Go Trucking, and petitions Freight into bankruptcy, this most likely warrants
a bonus to Oliver for effectively eliminating the firm's debts.
a discharge for Freight in bankruptcy.
a pierce of the corporate veil.
the application of the doctrine of corporation by estoppel to Go Go Trucking.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
