Question 4 For this question you can either answer option 1 or option 2 depending on what you studied in the course. You should not attempt both. Option 1 Figure 1 shows an extract from the CEEQUAL manual you used for yourCEEQUAL case study a) Give two reasons why the project might not get awarded marks in Question 11.1.1 (4 marks) b) The project is located in a rural area with very few neighbours. The assessor has decided that the policy described in 11.1.1 would be of little benefit. Can this question be scoped out? (2 marks) c) Give a scenario where question 11.1.2 could be scoped out. (4 marks) d) How does this scoping out procedure affect the marks for this question? (5 marks) Client Design Con. struction 5 1111 Does the contractor have a policy or code of practice regarding considerate behaviour (eg. Considerate Constructors Scheme or NSO its own Code of Practice)? If No, score 0; if Yes, score 5 Evidence: Code of Practice or Policy statement, registration with Considerate Constructors Scheme or similar 5 11.1.2 Are there any measures included in the design of the scheme that go beyond those agreed at the plannmg permission stage that are intended to mitigate any minsance caused by the operation of the scheme once constructed? If No, score 0; if Yes, score 5 Appropriate measures could mclude for example choice of surfacing material in roads, noise bunds, sight screening and revised lighting Note however that some measures may need regulatory approval. Evidence needs to be provided to show design changes made subsequent to planning approval that were not also planning conditions. The ability of these changes to initigate nuisance needs to be mutually agreed between Assessor and Verifier. Figure 1. Extract from CEEQUAL manual Question 4 For this question you can either answer option 1 or option 2 depending on what you studied in the course. You should not attempt both. Option 1 Figure 1 shows an extract from the CEEQUAL manual you used for yourCEEQUAL case study a) Give two reasons why the project might not get awarded marks in Question 11.1.1 (4 marks) b) The project is located in a rural area with very few neighbours. The assessor has decided that the policy described in 11.1.1 would be of little benefit. Can this question be scoped out? (2 marks) c) Give a scenario where question 11.1.2 could be scoped out. (4 marks) d) How does this scoping out procedure affect the marks for this question? (5 marks) Client Design Con. struction 5 1111 Does the contractor have a policy or code of practice regarding considerate behaviour (eg. Considerate Constructors Scheme or NSO its own Code of Practice)? If No, score 0; if Yes, score 5 Evidence: Code of Practice or Policy statement, registration with Considerate Constructors Scheme or similar 5 11.1.2 Are there any measures included in the design of the scheme that go beyond those agreed at the plannmg permission stage that are intended to mitigate any minsance caused by the operation of the scheme once constructed? If No, score 0; if Yes, score 5 Appropriate measures could mclude for example choice of surfacing material in roads, noise bunds, sight screening and revised lighting Note however that some measures may need regulatory approval. Evidence needs to be provided to show design changes made subsequent to planning approval that were not also planning conditions. The ability of these changes to initigate nuisance needs to be mutually agreed between Assessor and Verifier. Figure 1. Extract from CEEQUAL manual