Question $83(1$ point$)$

Jack strikes another car, the force of which knocks it into a power line, that unbelievably falls over and electrocutes a bystander. Analyzing causation in the tort case against Jack filed on behalf of the electrocuted person,

cause in fact is clear but proximate cause might not be found.

neither cause in fact nor proximate cause are clear.

Jack will be liable, at least as to causation.

Question $84(1$ point$)$

One of the elements of fraudulent misrepresentation is an intent to deceive.

True

False