Question 9 Across more than one Learning Outcome {30 marks) You are a claims handler for an insurer. You have received a claim from one of the insurer's policyholders, ABC Ltd, a bus company. One of ABC Ltd's buses was involved in an incident which resulted in serious injuries to two pedestrians. The whole incident was caught on closedcircuit television (CCTV) cameras and the policyholder has accepted full liability. Pedestrian A claimed for loss of earnings, for a sixmonth period, due to reduced mobility as a result of the incident. Pedestrian B claimed for loss of eamings . Payments have been made to both pedestrians in full setliement of these claims. Subsequently, you have established that: - Pedestrian A had been playing golf with no apparent mobility issues, during the period for which they claimed. - Pedestrian El presented fake payslips in support of their claim. - Pedestrian B has since moved overseas to another country. You are now seeking to obtain recoveries from pedestrian A and pedetrian B. (a) Explain, with justication, how the false information provided by pedestrians A and B differs in law. Refer to one relevant case in support of your explanation. {1(1) (b) Explain, with justication, two methods of recovery available to the insurer for the claims payment paid to pedestrians A and B. Refer to one statute in support of your explanation. {12) (c) Identify, with justication, the burden and standard of proof for each method of recovery you have explained in (b) above. [8)