Question $9$

Relating back to the question immediately above, Darryl changes his mind and

says he wants to only sue Alice. He asks you, his attorney, whether he can sue

just Alice for his injuries caused by Charlie's failure to put up a wet floor sign

after mopping.

No$,$ because according to the reckless conduct rule, only the partner that was

reckless in their conduct can be held liable.

Yes, because of the doctrine of joint and several liability.

No$,$ because of the doctrine of present application. Only Charlie should be sued

because he was the one that did something wrong and Alice and Betty weren't even

present.

Yes, because of the doctrine of in limine$.$