Question: Question Completion Status Moving to another question will save this response. Question 1 of 235 Question 1 1 points Case Study 1 The Raptor was

Question Completion Status Moving to another
Question Completion Status Moving to another
Question Completion Status Moving to another
Question Completion Status Moving to another
Question Completion Status Moving to another
Question Completion Status Moving to another question will save this response. Question 1 of 235 Question 1 1 points Case Study 1 The Raptor was a popular truck. However, it had a serious design problem: the fuel tank was at the back of the truck. The company knew that the Router would explode in rear end collisions even at speeds as low as 10 mph. In order to decide what to do they conducted a cost benefit analysis. They could fox the problem by Installing a special shield that would protect the fuel tank and prevent it from exploding however that would cost them a total of $ 140 million. On the other hand, If they do not fox the problem, they would only have to pay $57.9 million in damages to injured victims and the families of those who died. Thus, facing the problem will incur more costs than not fing it. So they decided that they should not spend the money to fix the problem and did not install the protective shield. The company's decision to do what is in its own self-interest while disregarding the Interests of the customers is something that would be encouraged by which of the following theories? Moral relativism Deontology Cultural relativism Ethical Egoism Virtue Ethics hp Remaining Time: 1 hour, 48 minutes, 47 seconds Question Completion Status Question 2 1 points Case Study:1 The Raptor was a popular truck. However, it had a serious design problem: the fuel tank was at the back of the truck. The company knew that the Router would explode in rear-end collisions even at speeds as low as 10 mph. In order to decide what to do they conducted a cost benefit analysis. They could for the problem by installing a special shed that would protect the fuel tank and prevent it from exploding, however that would cost them a total of $ 140 million. On the other hand, if they do not for the problem they would only have to pay $57.9 million in damages to injured victims and the families of those who died. Thus, facing the problem will incur more costs than not fading it. So they decided that they should not spend the money to fix the problem and did not install the protective shield The cost benefit analysis conducted by Raptor represents which step of the Ethical Decision Making Framework Determine the facts Evaluate alternative actions identity stakeholders identify the ethical issues involved Question 2 of 23 Moving to another question will save this response. (hp Remaining Time: 1 hour, 48 minutes, 33 seconds. Question Completion Status Case Study 2 Mr. Winston is the managing CEO of james Philips Co. Itd. He is known to engage in highly unethical behaviors. The following are some examples Every morning, he comments on his secretary Katie appearance and tells her how beautiful he thinks she is even though she is clearly uncomfortable with that. He also keep teling her dirtyjokes. Katie feels intimidated and distressed and tries to avoid him whenever she can. Sometimes she even cals in sick just to avoid being around him. This affected her ability to do her job effectively One afternoon, one of his employees, Monica went into his office and asked him for a promotion. He told her that he would promote her if she agrees to be his pelfriend. One time, he refused to hire a man named Denzel, who was the most qualified candidate for the position, just because he was African American. On another occasion, Mr. Halston hired his brother Robert as the head of operations even though he was very unqualified for that position Mr. Winston also has a strong dislikes people with wheelchairs. In order to discourage them from applying for a job at his company, he always writes in the recruitment ads driver's license required" even though the position does not really require that. Mentioning "driver's license required" is an example of: Direct discrimination In-group/out-group Stereotyping Indirect discrimination None of the above Question 3 of 23 Moving to another question will save this response. hp X Remaining Time: 1 hour, 48 minutes 22 seconds Question completion Status Question 4 1 points Case Study 2 Mr. Winston is the managing CEO of James Phillips Co.Itd. He is known to engage in highly unethical behaviors. The following are some examples Every morning, he comments on his secretary Katie appearance, and tells her how beautiful he thinks she is even though she is clearly uncomfortable with that. He also keep teling her dirtyjokes Katie feels intimidated and distressed and tries to avoid him whenever she can. Sometimes she even calls in sick just to avoid being around him. This affected her ability to do her job effectively. One afternoon one of his employees, Monica went into his office and asked him for a promotion. He told her that he would promote her if she agrees to be his girlfriend. One time, he refused to hire a man named Denzel who was the most qualified candidate for the position. just because he was African American. On another occasion, Mr. Halston hired his brother Robert as the head of operations even though he was very unqualified for that position Mr. Winston also has a strong dislikes people with wheelchairs. In order to discourage them from applying for a job at his company, he always writes in the recruitment adsdrivers license required even though the position does not really require that What Mr. Winston is doing with Katie is Hostile work environment sexual harassment Glass celling All of the above None of the above Quid pro quo sexual harassment hp Remaining Time: 1 hour, 48 minutes. 11 seconds. Question Completion Status Questions 1 points Case Study 1 The Raptor was a popular truck. However, it had a serious design problem: the fuel tank was at the back of the truck. The company knew that the Router would explode in rear-end collisions even at speeds as low as 10 mph. In order to decide what to do they conducted a cost benefit analysis. They could fix the problem by installing a special shield that would protect the fuel tank and prevent it from exploding however that would cost them a total of $ 140 million. On the other hand, if they do not for the problem, they would only have to pay $57.9 million in damages to injured victims and the families of those who died. Thus, fuding the problem will incur more costs than not foxing it. So they decided that they should not spend the money to fix the problem and did not install the protective shield The cost benefit analysis conducted in the case is most in line with which of the following theories? Virtue Ethics Deontology Utilitarianism Moral relativism Question 5 of 2 Moving to another question will save this response

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!