Question: How is below case relevant to data law, ethics and business intelligence? Please explain and include reference.

The topic is from contemporary legal concerns because it addresses the question, Does the President Possess Constitutional Authority to Order Wiretaps on US Citizens?

Purpose

The act of recording communications between parties often without their consent is known as wiretapping. Although wiretaps are a powerful investigative tool for law enforcement, they also legally violate both the right to privacy and the protection provided by the constitution against unreasonable search and seizure.

In 2002, the Department of Justice agrees that the Constitution applies in this particular case. enables the use of electronic surveillance by the president. with or without judicial control or consent from Congress. asserts that the wiretapping program carried out by the National Security Agency (NSA) in accordance with President Bush's order is legal.

Contrarily, a number of attorneys with experience in federal government or constitutional law claimedthat the NSA's wiretapping breaches FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) and the 4th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. They asserted that the President lacks the inherent power to conduct warrantless wiretapping or break federal laws that limit surveillance.

In order to determine whether the president's decision to wiretap American citizens without first obtaining FISA approval would violate both their right to privacy and the constitution's prohibition on unreasonablesearch and seizure, I would like to assess the yes and no choices available for this specific topic.