question number 40

Questions 39 and 40 are based on the following: The Gracie Company was owned by three brothers: Taz, Gussell and Leo Gracie. The brothers had equal control and, under ordinary circumstances, the company had no controversy. However, the brothers had some differing views when it came to corporate social responsibility. Taz would listen to any charity that requested a donation of money or materials from the company. Gussell would seek out opportunities for the company to make donations to, as he called it, "a good cause." Leo insisted that the company needed to focus on obeying the law and making a profit. Things came to a head when Taz proposed to agree to a request from a local church for a new lighting system in its main building. Neither Gussell nor Leo were religious so they quickly objected to this proposal. (Question 39 is on this page; question 40 is on the next page.) 40. Which of the following is the best example of an intermediate or medium response to social demands? A. Taz would listen to any charity that requested a donation of money or materials from the company B. Gussell would seek out opportunities for the company to make donations to, as he called it, "a good cause." C. Leo insisted that the company needed to focus on obeying the law and making a profit. D. Neither Gussell nor Leo were religious so they quickly objected to the proposal to agree to a request from a local church for a new lighting system in its main building