question :what is the issues,rules analysis and decision of this case?

case:Menagh v. Hamilton (City), 2005 36268 (ON SC) [Note: Your instructor may assign this case as a Shared Writing activity.] Menagh, a lawyer, was employed by the City of Hamilton as its Director of Labour Relations & Employee Wellness Health and Safety. After 13 years of service, he was terminated for just cause. The evidence established that Mr. Menagh had engaged in a romantic relationship with another city employee, but when that relationship ended, Menagh engaged in a long run of sexual harassment. Menagh even went so far as to approach the Mayor in an attempt to have his former girlfriend, the Mayors Chief of Staff, fired. The employer had numerous workplace policies, including one stating that all employees have a right to a working environment free from sexual harassment and personal harassment in the workplace. Menagh sued for wrongful dismissalchallenging whether there was cause and whether the discipline imposed was proportionate to any wrong committed. List the factors that will be considered as relevant to the courts decision. Do you think that his position will be relevant?