raw a conclusion about the data from the graph, table or chart from your screenshot above in context of the article. Make an inference based on the data displayed E. Pick two alternate graphs/charts/tables that could be used to display the same data as your selected chart/graph/table from your screenshot above. List the pros and cons of these alternative graphs" Alternative Graph/Chart/Table #1: Pros: Cons: Alternative Graph/Chart/Table #2: Pros: Cons: F. Explain how the graphs/charts/tables that you selected above (Part E) would be structured to display the data in the article. Alternative Graph/Chart/Table

2886 Ghosh et al.: Trends in National Institutes of Health Funding J IM 50 Institute FIC NIA 40- NIAID Total Research Funds, USD M (unadjusted) NICHD NIEHS NIGMS 20 OD Other 200 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 200% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2015 2014 2018 201 2018 2019 2020 Year Figure 1 National institutes of health funding related to climate change and natural disasters, 2001 to 2020, by institute, center, and office. FIC, Fogarty International Center; NIA, National Institute of Aging; NIAID, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; NICHD, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; NIEHS, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; NIGMS, National Institute of General Medical Sciences; OD, Office of the Director; Other, all other NIH institutes and centers combined burden of funding scientific research should also be borne by the attribution of disease-related morbidity and mortality to other well-funded NIH institutes. Inasmuch as social determi climate change and natural disasters, and the development and nants of health have begun to be incorporated into causal evaluation of evidence-based adaptation and mitigation strat- health frameworks, environmental determinants of health egies at local, state, and federal levels, and clinical guidelines O