READ CASE $11\mathrm{.}3-$ BAILEYV. KENTUCKY LOTTERY CORP. contained in your book.

Answer the Critical Thinking Questions:

The Lottery's rules did not provide for entrints to be notified by e$-$mail, but contracts generally impose on the parties a duty to do everything necessary to carry them out. Did the Lottery breach its contract with Bailey by failing to notify him by e$-$mail? Explain.

What If the Facts Were Different? Suppose that Bailey had complied with the Lottery's rules by keeping his address and phone number current, but that the Lottery had not tried to notify him before the expiration of the seven$-$day period. Would the result have been different? Why or why not?