Read Case $7\mathrm{.}1$: Schwarck v$.$ Arctic Cat, Inc., pp$.136-137.$ Conduct further research, and address the following questions:

Does a manufacturer have an ethical obligation beyond its legal duty to warn the buyers of its products of defects? Explain.

Suppose that the Arctic Cat $660$ did not have an alarm bell and that occasionally, when the gearshift was pushed forward, the vehicle did not shift into forward as expected. Is this a feature that the plaintiffs might have asserted as a defect? Explain

Case Analysis guide:

You must give quality answers that show mastery of the case, using clear logic, and supporting facts. Also, the answers must directly address the case.

Case Analyses test the understanding of key elements of the Legal Environment of Business, therefore they must be thoroughly addressed.

You must use citations with references to document information obtained from sources. The key elements of Legal Environment of Business are found in the sources listed in the syllabus $($it is your duty to search for them, read, analyze, evaluate, summarize, paraphrase in your answers, and cite the authors who wrote the articles, books, term papers, memoirs, studies, etc. What it means is that you will have not less than $2$ references from the listed sources.

Grammatically correct paper, no typos, and must have obviously been proofread for logic.

Questions must be typed out as headings, with follow up answers in paragraph format, and a summary or conclusion at the end of the paper as in the outline to be provided by the professor.

Case Analysis must be in APA format and are due no later than the specified time $($Sunday $11$:$59$ pm$).$