Read Case $7\mathrm{.}1$: Schwarck v$.$ Arctic Cat, Inc., pp$.136-137.$ Conduct further research, and address the following questions:

Does a manufacturer have an ethical obligation beyond its legal duty to warn the buyers of its products of defects? Explain.

Suppose that the Arctic Cat $660$ did not have an alarm bell and that occasionally, when the gearshift was pushed forward, the vehicle did $n$ shift into forward as expected. Is this a feature that the plaintiffs might have asserted as a defect? Explain