Read$$Continental Insurance Co$.$ v$.$ NLRB$,495$ F$\mathrm{.}2$d $44(2$d Cir. $1974)$

$1.$ In Your Submission, Identify:

The court hearing the case.

The parties involved.

The issues in dispute relevant to our topics this week.$$

The positions of the parties on the issues in dispute. State each party's position separately.

$2.$ Summarize the court$$s holding.

$3.$ State whether you agree with the decision, why or why not $($ not just $$yes or no$)?$ Use facts and legal doctrines from the case to support your opinion.$$

$4.$ Answer: Based on your analysis of the Continental case, what elements would you use to define the concept of bargaining in good faith?

$5$ Answer:$$Which actions taken by Continental's attorneys do you believe crossed the line into "bad faith" negotiating tactics? Do you believe the conduct was unethical? Why?

$6.$Answer: How do you reconcile the$$concept that the statutory duty to bargain collectively does not obligate a party to make concessions or to move on terms, but parties are obligated to do more than merely go through formalities of negotiation? $($You may research this topic and cite to other sources, but are not required to do so$.)$