*Read, Reasearch, and provide a 3-4 paragraph reflection/response. provide examples if possible*

John and Larry lived at the Hampton Apartments which has a pool in back. There is a path some people take to get to the pool that has a sign saying "Path Closed; Do not use." They used it anyway as they, and others, often do. There are some steps with a loose hand railing. John was using it when it gave way and he tumbled down the steps suffering a head injury that may leave him mentally impaired. John sues the management company and the apartment owners who says they had no idea the path was being improperly used and no idea that the hand railing was loose.

Tell me who wins the lawsuit and why? Does Larry satisfy the elements for a negligence claim, and should he? Should the management company and owners get off notwithstanding the serious injury? Make the arguments for both sides but who should win?

John and any lived at the moon cartients which has a pool in back. There is home to the pool saying "Path Closed Dome They used away as they and other hende There are some stes with a loose and rowsing it when it geway and he tumbled down the steps suffering that may be mentally impaired ones the management condary and the owners who say they had no idea the path was being properly used and no idea that the landling was loose Tell me who was the lawsuit and whi? Does Larry said the elements for a sence claim and should be? Should the management company and owners pet oftastwithstanding the series Injury? Make the arguments for both sides but who should win! , and arrived at the Harmoton Aarents which a pool in back. The other the teet to the pool that oth Closed on the they and other often dol There are ses with a loose and lowest when it www debe down the strinjury that the commande hadde the momento de math and we loose To me who wis www Does anys hements for an ince claim, and should be should come witstanding the others to both it but show