Read the case below and answer the questions that follow.

(3 marks each)

Fran Jefferson supervised the Training Department of Metro Bank. One of her star employees, Judy Martin, surprised Fran one day with a job posting application. Judy wanted to transfer to another department where the employees made more money (in higher evaluated jobs) and supposedly did less work. In the ensuing discusion, Fran leanred that Judy was very unhappy with the merit increase she had recently received. Judy believed she could earn more money in the open position, which was three grades higher that the position she currently occupied.

Judy now functioned more as an administrative assisstant than as the departmental secretary (the position for which she had been hired). Fran knew that the job evaluation in use was valid and up-to-date, and that grade differences between Judys job and the open position meant real differences in responsibility, skill, and accountability. Fran did not want to lose Judy.

1. What are the reasons given by Judy Martin for wanting to post for a position in another department? Which reasons are accurate and which ones are debatable?

Answer:

2. How should Fran respond to Judys request to transfer?

Answer:

3. How should Fran respond to Judys salary complaints?

Answer:

p.s no handwriting no copy paste