Read the case of NAACP v. North Hudson Regional Fire & Rescue , 665 F.3d 464 summary.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Question:

Read the case of NAACP v. North Hudson Regional Fire & Rescue, 665 F.3d 464 summary. Write a paper, incorporating answers to Case Questions 1 through 5. Your written work should include discussion of the situation, responses to questions at the end of the fact patterns, and any other questions that your instructor sends, and your description of how the situation should have been handled. Explain the court’s decision in the case. Do you agree? Support your position with research and analysis.

Your analysis should be at a high level, meeting all content required in the assignment presented. All work should be completed following APA guidelines contained in the Publications Manual, 6th edition. Please ensure that your work is properly cited. A failure to properly cite sources may result in a grade reduction or a grade of zero.

Below is the link of the case summary

https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/618714/naacp-v-north-hudson-regional-fire-rescue/

Case question

1.What were the legal issues in this case? What did the appeals court decide?

2.How should the “relevant labor market” be defined in a case like this? What was the evidence that the residency requirement had adverse (disparate) impact on African- Americans?

3. What reasons did the employer offer for having a residency requirement? Why were these insufficient to show business necessity?

4. What are the practical implications of this decision for public employer? Should they impose residency requirements at all? Would they be better off with stricter residency requirements (i.e., residency is required for both applicants and current employees)? With more lenient policies (i.e., residency is preferred, but not required)?

5. Do you agree with the decision in this case? Why or why not?