Regarding assigned case Lyon v$.$ Carey, $533$ F$\mathrm{.}2$d $649($Cir$.$ Ct$.$ App. DC $1976)$:

Why does the court discuss the point that the assault did not occur on the employer$$s premises?

Select all options that apply.

I. Because this is a consideration that goes against a finding that the employee$$s conduct was within the scope of employment.

II$.$ Because location of an intentional tort is dispositive on the issue of whether an employer will be liable for an employee$$s intentional tort.

III. Because an employer is only liable for torts that occur on their premises