$[$Related to Solved Problem $8\mathrm{.}3]$ The Economist magazine tracks the prices of the McDonald's Big Mac

hamburger in countries around the world. The following table shows the price of Big Macs in the United States

and in five other countries, along with the exchange rate between that country's currency and the U$.$S$.$ dollar.

Source: "The Economist Big Mac Index," Economist, July $26,2012.$

With respect to the theory of purchasing power parity, the statistics in this table are

A$.$ inconsistent since the domestic currency prices of Big Macs $($for the non$-$U$.$S$.$ countries$),$ when

converted into dollars, differ markedly from $$4\mathrm{.}33.$

B$.$ consistent since the domestic currency prices of Big Macs $($for the non$-$U$.$S$.$ countries$),$ when

converted into dollars, would not differ from $$4\mathrm{.}33$ if transportation costs are included.

C$.$ inconsistent, since purchasing power parity implies that $$4\mathrm{.}33,$ when converted into other currencies,

should be sufficient to just purchase a Big Mac in the non$-$U$.$S$.$ countries.

D$.$ neither consistent or inconsistent, since purchasing power parity only applies to non$-$traded products.

E$.$ Both A and $C$ are correct.

If the purchasing power parity theory allowed us to exactly determine exchange rates in the short run, the

exchange rate between the South Korean won and the Swiss franc would be won per franc. $($Enter your

response rounded to three decimal places.$)$