Question: Remaining Time: 2 7 minutes, 0 6 seconds. Question Completion Status: Sal is liable for religious discrimination for falling to provide an accommodation that Lalonya
Remaining Time: minutes, seconds.
Question Completion Status:
Sal is liable for religious discrimination for falling to provide an accommodation that Lalonya would accept.
Sal is liable for religious discrimination for failing to provide a reasonable alternative.
Sal is not liable for religious discrimination because LaTonya's religious practice is not followed by any other employee at the company.
Sal is not liable for religious discrimination because he made an effort to reasonably accommodate LaTonya's religious practice.
QUESTION
Leland applies for a position as a fundraiser in the Alumni Relations Department of Wayne College. During the interview, he mentions to Callie, the director of the Alumni Relations Department, that his wife has just been diagnosed with leukemia. In spite of Leland having eight years of fundraising experience, he is denied the job. Which of the following holds true in this case?
Leland has an associational discrimination claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act because disabled employees or applicants associated with disabled individuals have more rights to a job than do nondisabled applicants.
Leland does not have an associational discrimination claim as he is not the one with a disability.
Leland does not have an associational discrimination claim as he is not yet an employee of Wayne College.
Leland has an associational discrimination claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act if he can prove that the employer assumed his performance would be impaired because of his association with a disabled person.
QUESTION
Logan is a highievel manager at Oranges Inc. She has substantial executive authority at the company. When she turns her company forces her to take mandatory retirement in exchange for an annual pension of $ Logan decides to file an age discrimination suit against Oranges. Which of the following statements is true in thi case?
Logan will most likely lose because it is legal for companies to subject managers, regardless of their supervisory level, to mandatory retirement.
Logan wilimost likely iose because it is legal for companies to subject managers to mandatory retirement as long as they receive a company pension, regardless of the
Logah will most likely lose because it is legal for companies to subject highlevel managers with substantial executive authority to mandatory retirement at the age of Q Logan will most likely win because it is illegal for companies to subject any managers to mandatory retirement.
Click Save and Submit to save and submit. Click Save All Answers to save all answers.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
