Reply to this. In a criminal justice context, especially during interviews or interrogations, the most important strategy of constructive arguments for a detective is "using evidence to support claims." This strategy ensures that the conversation remains fact based, reducing the risk of coercion, bias, or misinterpretation. When detective support their questions or assertions with documented evidence such as timestamps, video footage, or witness accounts it lends credibility to the interview process and may prompt suspects or witnesses to provide a more truthful and consistent statements. This strategy helps mitigate risk by maintaining transparency and professionalism. It also protects the integrity of the investigation by ensuring that all conclusions are grounded in verifiable facts. In high stakes environments, this reduces the risk of wrongful accusations and strengthens the reliability of testimony or confessions that may later be presented in court. From what I've learned about extended arguments, critical thinking traits like clarity, precision, logic, and perseverance are essential. Developing these traits allows criminal justice professionals to construct thorough, well-supported arguments in both spoken and written formats. Being able to craft extended arguments will be especially important in my desired career in corrections or investigations, where clear communication and detailed reporting are critical. Whether writing incident reports or explaining the