Respond on topic. Read article "you mean they ate them?" And cite from the article and cheeseman $10$th edition textbook chapter $1.$Refer to the philosophies by quoting and citing ONLY your textbook. Penalties applied if you quote and cite to anything other than your textbook for the philosophies. $($In this project, certainly quote or paraphrase the Justices, but since all participants must read that article $($the case itself$),$ the "rule of thumb" in quoting a case study is not to cite it$.$ We've all read it$,$ in other words, and no one needs to tell the reader how to find it via a citation. Furthermore, the case does not reference any philosophy$).$

Write $($cut & paste$)$ in your message$($s$)$ as your Subject Line, EXACTLY the following:

$(1)$ XX$\text{'}$s Topic Post $($Category A$)$

Question $1$:

From the case itself, what was the outcome of the case? In other words, what conclusion did the appellate court reach regarding the trial court's decision?

Question $2$:

$($a$)$ List the names of each Justice you read about in the case;

$($b$)$ Next to each name, provide the individual Justice's outcome $($how he voted$)$;

$($c$)$ Review the textbook's discussions on the various judicial philosophies. Next to each outcome, select from the textbook which school$($s$)$ of jurisprudential thought to which you maintain each Justice ascribed. That is$,$ which Justice followed which philosophy? Support your conclusion for each Justice by $($i$)$ quoting from the case what the Justice said, and $($ii$)$ quoting from the textbook the relevant section$($s$)$ you applied $($to support your answer$($s$)).$

NO POINTS for this Category will be awarded without the appropriate, supporting quote$($s$)!.$

For example, $"$Q$2$: $($a$)$ Chief Justice Truepenny's $($b$)$ outcome was XXX$.($c$)$ His philosophy is represented by the XXX School of Thought. The textbook on page $6$ describes XXX School as$,"[$insert quote from the textbook here$][$Citation$]."$ This view compares to Truepenny's view as represented by his statement$($s$)$ in his opinion, $"[$insert quote from the Case here$][$Citation$]."$