Question: Review the cases belowand answer the questions: Caley v. Gulfstream Aero. Corp., 428 F.3d 1359 (11th Cir. Ga. 2005) The appeals court held that continued
Review the cases belowand answer the questions:
- Caley v. Gulfstream Aero. Corp., 428 F.3d 1359 (11th Cir. Ga. 2005)
The appeals court held that continued employment was evidence of acceptance of the offer and employment was consideration. Because the employees were already working. Why was there consideration? Was there a change in anything?
If the case had come out the opposite. How could an employer change the terms of the working arrangement (contract)?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
