Rivermist Holding Ltd$.$ v$.$ McGregor Estate, $2012$ BCSC $1645($CanLII$)$Rivermist hired McGregor Management to construct a storage facility.McGregor Management then hired Rivermist as a subcontractor for some excavation work. Allan McGregor negotiated both contracts on behalf of McGregor Management. McGregor Management failed to pay $$75780$ of the balance owed to Rivermist. Allan then claimed that the estate of his mother was liable for the second contract, as he and his brother were agents for his mother's business, McGregor Management. Rivermist was unaware of the mother's involvement in the McGregor Management; all of its dealings were with the McGregor brothers.Are the McGregor brothers personally liable for the debt? Explain your, answer Write a letter to the editor of a local newspaper about your stance$\mathrm{.}5.$ Include the answers to the following questions:a$.$ What are the facts in both cases?b$.$ Identify the legislations related to the cases.c$.$ What legal questions are the key determining factors in both cases?d$.$ Justify your answer to the legal questions you have identified.e$.$ Persuade the editor by providing facts to support the argument.f$.$ Write a one$-$page summary for each case.