Secondly, in another incident, Morgan, a shelf$-$stacker at the Hilltop Grocery Corporation$$s store, was injured when a bottle of soda spontaneously exploded while being placed into the store's cooler. This particular bottle was part of a shipment that had been stored in the store's indoors delivery area for thirty$-$six hours post$-$delivery by the bottling company. Although the bottler had subjected the bottle to standard industry tests for defects, there was no evidence to suggest that Morgan or any other employee had damaged the bottle between the delivery and its unexpected explosion. Morgan decided to file a lawsuit against the bottling company for damages sustained. Unable to pinpoint specific acts of negligence on the part of the bottling company, Morgan is considering reliance on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur for the lawsuit. Is recovery of damages under this theory a plausible outcome for Morgan?