Select the best answer choice.

Regardins essigned case Messingv. Bank of Americe, $821$ A$.2$ d $22($Md$.2003)$:

The plaintiff claimed that the Bank dishonored the acceptance. What did the court say about that essertion?

$$ Ther was no distonor because the thumbprint was a reasonable means of identification.

There was dishonor because the thumbprint was not a reasonable means of identifcation.

Therer was dshonor because the check was not paid out after acceptance.

There was no dishonor because the check was accepted.