Select the correct answer and compelte the case:

Question 1 (0.5 points) The issue in Shepard was whether a sentencing court can look to police reports or complaint applications to determine if an earlier guilty plea necessarily admitted and supported a conviction for generic burglary. How did the Shepard court rule? Yes, the sentencing court may look to police reports and complaint applications. No, the sentencing court may not look to police reports and complaint applications. Question 2 (0.5 points) The Shepard laid out the "record of conviction," which are the permissible documents that allow a court to examine a prior conviction. What five items does the court state constitute the record of conviction? AQuestion 3 (0.5 points) The Rodarte-Roman court notes that Section 309(a) the of Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA) states that its effective date is A/ Question 4 (0.5 points) The respondent Rodarte-Roman was present in the U.S. without authorization from 1993 until May 1997, when he departed the U.S. before returning again. Did the court conclude that this time in the U.S. from 1993 to May 1997 constituted "unlawful presence"? Yes, because when he was present in the U.S. without authorization from 1993 through May 1997, he accrued unlawful presence. No, because IIRIRA created the concept of unlawful presence. Also, it had an effective date of April 1, 1997 and was not retroactive. Thus, he did not accrue "unlawful presence" from 1993 to May 1997 for the purposes of triggering the 10-year bar of inadmissibility