Question: Smith s Investments Ltd . ( Smith ) made a claim for recovery of a proprietary nature in consequences of alleged breach of fiduciary duty.
Smiths Investments LtdSmith made a claim for recovery of a proprietary nature in consequences of alleged breach of fiduciary duty. It was made in the aftermath of a fraudulent conspiracy carried on by Louis Cooper and Michael Cambridge in Their fraud was one whereby socalled traders including Smith, were induced to advance money to an offshore company called Commonwealth Sunshine LtdCSL by false representations that the money would be used by CSL for trading transactions of a particular type. Smith was induced to advance $m to CSL
In fact money advanced by the traders was not used by CSL for such transactions. It was instead in a crossfiring operation involving transfers between bank accounts held by CSL Inagua Trading Company ITC and other companies in the control of Messrs. Cambridge and Cooper with the object and effect of falsely inflating CSLs turnover, profit and assets. ITC was a subsidiary of Inagua Group plc IGP a listed company. The further effect of the fraud was falsely to inflate the value of IGPs shares and so enable Mr Cooper to procure his company Marlin LtdMarlin to sell shares it held in IGP at that inflated price: Marlin sold approximately of its IGP shares on November for just under $
Marlin also held through Hibiscus, a subsidiary a valuable house, which Mr Cooper, at Strawberry Gardens, Blue Hill Road Blue property Hibiscus had purchased it on June, with the help of a loan from the Bank of Wealth Ltd plc on the security of a charge of the property. The charge was paid off by September With in round figuresi $m of the proceeds of sale of the IGP shares that Marlin had sold in August and ii $ provided by Mr Cooper from an unknown source.
The sham basis of ITCs trading activities and on which IGP attained its status as a listed company could not continue undiscovered indefinitely. The collapse came on September when three creditor banks appoint joint administrative receivers in respect of ITC and IGP. The joint receivers later entered into a series of settlement agreements with Mr Cooper and Marlin, a result of which the Blue property was sold on December Out of the proceeds, and pursuant to the agreements, some $m was paid to the receivers, which they still hold.
Discuss the following:
a Did a fiduciary relationship arise in this scenario and if so to whom?
b Who is entitled to funds and on what grounds?
c Is Smith Investments Limited entitled to proceeds from the Blue property?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
