Question: Smith s Investments Ltd . ( Smith ) made a claim for recovery of a proprietary nature in consequences of alleged breach of fiduciary duty.

Smiths Investments Ltd.(Smith) made a claim for recovery of a proprietary nature in consequences of alleged breach of fiduciary duty. It was made in the aftermath of a fraudulent conspiracy carried on by Louis Cooper and Michael Cambridge in 2000. Their fraud was one whereby so-called traders, including Smith, were induced to advance money to an offshore company called Commonwealth Sunshine Ltd.(CSL) by false representations that the money would be used by CSL for trading transactions of a particular type. Smith was induced to advance $5.7m to CSL.
In fact money advanced by the traders was not used by CSL for such transactions. It was instead in a cross-firing operation involving transfers between bank accounts held by CSL, Inagua Trading Company (ITC) and other companies in the control of Messrs. Cambridge and Cooper with the object and effect of falsely inflating CSLs turnover, profit and assets. ITC was a subsidiary of Inagua Group plc (IGP), a listed company. The further effect of the fraud was falsely to inflate the value of IGPs shares and so enable Mr. Cooper to procure his company Marlin Ltd.(Marlin) to sell shares it held in IGP at that inflated price: Marlin sold approximately 5% of its IGP shares on 9 November 1999 for just under $58.
Marlin also held (through Hibiscus, a subsidiary) a valuable house, which Mr. Cooper, at 24 Strawberry Gardens, Blue Hill Road (Blue property). Hibiscus had purchased it on 17 June, 2001 with the help of a loan from the Bank of Wealth Ltd plc on the security of a charge of the property. The charge was paid off by 14 September 2003. With (in round figures)(i) $18.6m of the proceeds of sale of the IGP shares that Marlin had sold in August 2001 and (ii) $750,000 provided by Mr. Cooper from an unknown source.
The sham basis of ITCs trading activities and on which IGP attained its status as a listed company could not continue undiscovered indefinitely. The collapse came on 1 September 2003 when three creditor banks appoint joint administrative receivers in respect of ITC and IGP. The joint receivers later entered into a series of settlement agreements with Mr. Cooper and Marlin, a result of which the Blue property was sold on 5 December 2005. Out of the proceeds, and pursuant to the agreements, some $10.4m was paid to the receivers, which they still hold.
Discuss the following:
(a) Did a fiduciary relationship arise in this scenario and if so to whom?
(b) Who is entitled to funds and on what grounds?
(c) Is Smith Investments Limited entitled to proceeds from the Blue property?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Accounting Questions!