States that have enacted stand$-$your$-$ground laws often include places of business as well as homes and vehicles. Consequently, businesspersons in those states can be less concerned about the "duty to retreat" doctrine. Presumably in stand$-$your$-$ground states, business liability insurance will eventually be less costly$.$

Those who are against stand$-$your$-$ground laws argue that they encourage vigilantism and preemptive shootings. Do you agree? Explain.

"A person's home is his or her castle." Does this traditional saying justify the use of deadly force against an intruder under all circumstances? Why or why not?