Question: Suppose that the true regression model that generates an outcome Y is given by Y = X1 +X2+ E, but instead I regress Y against

 Suppose that the true regression model that generates an outcome Y

is given by Y = X1 +X2+ E, but instead I regress

Suppose that the true regression model that generates an outcome Y is given by Y = X1 +X2+ E, but instead I regress Y against X, and X2, which are defined as X1 = 50X, and X2 = X2/50. Specifically, suppose that I estimate the coefficients by minimizing the following expression with respect to 3: n 2 2 E ( Vi - Bo - BIXli - B2X2i) + > CIB;1, i=1 j=1 Assume that your covariates are independent and you want to fit a regression model that also performs variable selection so you are considering either the lasso or best subset regression. Are there any situations when lasso might be expected to perform worse (in terms of prediction error) than best subset selection? If yes, describe such a situation. If not, explain why we would expect lasso to outperform best subset selection in general. Suppose I have a continuous outcome and my goal is to minimize P( (Y -Y)4 > 13). How would I choose tuning parameters or select the model that gives me the best performance with respect to this metric

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Mathematics Questions!