$\backslash$table$[[$Original Source Material,Student Version$],[$There is a design methodology called,Tripp and Bichelmeyer $(1990)$ suggested$],[$rapid prototyping, which has been,that rapid prototyping could be an$],[$used successfully in software,advantageous methodology for$],[$engineering$.$ Given similarities between,developing innovative computer$-$based$],[$software design and instructional design,,instruction. They noted that this$],[$we argue that rapid prototyping is a$,$approach has been used successfully in$],[$viable method for instructional,software engineering; hence, rapid$],[$design$,$ especially for computer$-$based,prototyping is a viable method for$],[$instruction$.,$instructional design due to many$],[$References:$,$parallels between software design and$],[$Tripp$,$ S$.$ D$.,$ & Bichelmeyer, B$.$ A$.(1990).,$instructional design.$],[$Rapid prototyping: An alternative,$],[$instructional design strategy. Educational,References:$],[$Technology Research and Development,,Tripp, S$.$ D$.,$ & Bichelmeyer, B$.$ A$.(1990).],[38(1),31-44.,$Rapid prototyping: An alternative$],[,$instructional design strategy. Educational$],[,$Technology Research and Development,$],[38(1),31-44.,]]$

Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?

Word$-$for$-$Word plagiarism

Paraphrasing plagiarism

This is not plagiarism