Taguchi's quality concept is based on a new quality concept. He did not define quality as a "good" attribute, but defined quality as "quality is the economic loss to society after goods are shipped." This definition explains "unqualified" because "loss to society" is not an ideal feature. What is your opinion on this definition? Some people also think that Taguchi's method is not so intuitive and more troublesome. Do you agree with these arguments? By illustrating Taguchi's "Design Quality Engineering" method, comment and discuss the above content Hits: Comments should be made based on the relevant illustrations of Taguchi's method and reading related reference materials