Question: Task Please submit your leadership philosophy paper here. Your paper will be a synthesis of your leadership philosophy and how you developed it. Instructions In
Task
Please submit your leadership philosophy paper here. Your paper will be a synthesis of your leadership philosophy and how you developed it.
Instructions
In this paper, please reflect on your leadership philosophy and the experiences and learning moments that have informed it.
- How do you define your leadership philosophy? Support your leadership philosophy.
- Why did you use those words?
- What do they mean?
- What do they mean to you?
- What leadership experiences in your life have had a profound impact that inspired this philosophy of leadership?
This paper should walk us through your definition with lots of elaboration, introspection, and synthesis. It should also liberally use course content. In this paper, you can relate different leadership theories and styles to your leadership philosophy.
Assignment Guidelines
Paper Layout
- Your paper should be at least 2 full pages (double-spaced).
- Space for Name and Date will not be included in the page calculation
- Times New Roman 12-point font.
- No spacing between paragraphs.
- 1-inch margins
Resources
- How do I submit an online assignment?Links to an external site.
- How do I upload a file as an assignment submission in Canvas?Links to an external site.
- How do I submit a text entry assignment?Links to an external site.
This assignment aligns with Module 3 Objective 3.
Rubric
Leadership Philosophy Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLeadership Philosophy Definition | 5 to >3.0 ptsExcellentClearly and insightfully defines leadership philosophy with strong justification and personal meaning. 3 to >2.0 ptsProficientDefines leadership philosophy with some justification and personal meaning. 2 to >1.0 ptsDevelopingDefines leadership philosophy but lacks depth or clarity in justification. 1 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementProvides a vague or unclear definition with little justification. 0 ptsNo MarksNo definition of leadership philosophy is provided. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeElaboration and Introspection | 5 to >3.0 ptsExcellentThoughtful and thorough explanation of chosen words, their meaning, and personal significance with strong introspection. 3 to >2.0 ptsProficientExplains chosen words, their meaning, and personal significance with some introspection. 2 to >1.0 ptsDevelopingExplanation lacks depth and introspection 1 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementMinimal explanation; lacks depth and reflection. 0 ptsNo MarksNo explanation provided. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLeadership Experiences & Impact | 5 to >3.0 ptsExcellentProvides detailed examples of leadership experiences with strong connections to leadership philosophy. 3 to >2.0 ptsProficientProvides relevant examples of leadership experiences with some connections to leadership philosophy. 2 to >1.0 ptsDevelopingProvides examples but connections to leadership philosophy are weak. 1 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementFew or unclear examples of leadership experiences provided. 0 ptsNo MarksNo examples of leadership experiences included. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Course Content & Leadership Theories | 5 to >3.0 ptsExcellentEffectively incorporates relevant leadership theories and course content, making strong connections. 3 to >2.0 ptsProficientIncorporates leadership theories and course content with some connections. 2 to >1.0 ptsDevelopingMentions leadership theories and course content but connections are weak. 1 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementMinimal mention of leadership theories or course content. 0 ptsNo MarksNo use of leadership theories or course content. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity, Organization & Writing Quality | 5 to >3.0 ptsExcellentPaper is well-organized, clear, and free of grammar/spelling errors. Ideas flow logically. 3 to >2.0 ptsProficientPaper is organized and mostly clear with few grammar/spelling errors. 2 to >1.0 ptsDevelopingSome organization issues and grammar/spelling errors; ideas may not always flow logically. 1 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementPaper is poorly organized with frequent grammar/spelling errors; ideas are difficult to follow. 0 ptsNo MarksPaper is poorly organized with frequent grammar/spelling errors; ideas are difficult to follow. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting & Length | 5 to >3.0 ptsExcellentFully meets formatting guidelines and is at least 2 full pages long. 3 to >2.0 ptsProficientMeets most formatting guidelines and is close to 2 full pages. 2 to >1.0 ptsDevelopingSome formatting issues and may be slightly under 2 pages. 1 to >0.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementDoes not meet formatting guidelines and is significantly under 2 pages. 0 ptsNo MarksFormatting is incorrect and paper is less than 1 page. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 30
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts