The case de is about the challenges in decision making of an earlier termination of project NJ shutdown the H River Tunnel Project In public projects, the real difficulties are shuttle of a project after has recorded on the books. It is resulted that the huge cost long run pr such as Company B$\text{'}$s "Big Dig$)$ have been permitted

Governor of the State NJ made a call in deciding the termination of River H Tunnel project reason for termination of the project is that the governor exhibited a number of fosy estimat fat does not match the actual cost occurred as on date. The arguments have been starte nether the project would be cancelled or not,

The following are the ways by which Person K responds to the argument:

The project has been carried out more fashionably as Person H$\text{'}$s theory of Hiding Hand. This theory states that some project benefits may be down the road even if the present advantage and costs of the projects are not in ing up with economic certainty.

Actual problem is determine nether the project value is assessed reasonably. The City S O House was a very big financial disaster. However, at present $($over decades$)$ it is a landmark of Country A The Fixed Link Channel Tunnel project does not earn any money. It lost the investors a fortune. Hence, the interesting question is that when should the project be assessed?" and it is an obvious question without right or wrong answer.