The Court is split, $5-5.$ Those who believe not extending constitutional protections to foreign spies and terrorists is needed, argue that this is necessary to protect America from threats of foreign terrorists and spies. On the other hand, there are those who believe the act tramples on Fourth Amendment protections against illegal searches and seizures and is therefore unconstitutional. You are the judge who will cast the deciding vote. You must weigh the costs of infringing on constitutional rights with the risk of national security threats.

What do you decide?

You vote holding the act unconstitutional, arguing that constitutional rights should not be taken lightly and stating that there are not enough protections in the act for U$.$S$.$ citizens in contact with spies and terrorists overseas.

You vote for the government's position holding the act constitutional, arguing that the safety of the country in this case outweighs the rights of foreign spies and terrorists and the domestic citizens in contact with them.