The defendant's employees had been working in a manhole. They left the cover off the manhole...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
The defendant's employees had been working in a manhole. They left the cover off the manhole when they went for lunch. They also left a paraffin lamp nearby. A young boy crawled down the manhole with the lamp. He was badly burned when the lamp fell and exploded. The explosion occurred because vapours escaped from the lamp and were ignited by the flame. The court held that the series of events was entirely unforeseeable. It nevertheless imposed liability because the type of injury that the plaintiff suffered, a burn, was reasonably foreseeable. It did not matter that the source of that burn was a bizarre accident rather than direct contact with the lamp's flame, as might have been expected. The remoteness principle is used to resolve thin skull cases. A thin skull case occurs if the plaintiff was unusually vulnerable to injury. In a literal example, suppose I am injury-prone because my skull is very thin. If you carelessly hit me on the head with a stick, are you responsible for all of my losses? What if a normal person would not have suffered any injury? What if a normal person would have suffered a minor injury, but not one as serious as mine? The law tries to strike a balance between its desire to compensate me and its desire to treat you fairly. You are not responsible at all if a normal person would not have suffered any harm. But you are fully responsible for all of my losses if it was reasonably foreseeable that a normal person would have suffered some damage. 381 For instance, if your carelessness would have bruised a normal person, I can fully recover for the fact that I also suffered brain damage. 382 Significantly for business people, the courts traditionally refused to apply a thin wallet principle. The defendant was not responsible for the fact that the plaintiff suffered to an unusual extent because the victim was poor. Today, however, the courts will hold the defendant fully liable if it was reasonably foreseeable that the plaintiff's poverty would cause it to suffer more than usual. 383 Business Decision 6.2 explores those issues. The defendant's employees had been working in a manhole. They left the cover off the manhole when they went for lunch. They also left a paraffin lamp nearby. A young boy crawled down the manhole with the lamp. He was badly burned when the lamp fell and exploded. The explosion occurred because vapours escaped from the lamp and were ignited by the flame. The court held that the series of events was entirely unforeseeable. It nevertheless imposed liability because the type of injury that the plaintiff suffered, a burn, was reasonably foreseeable. It did not matter that the source of that burn was a bizarre accident rather than direct contact with the lamp's flame, as might have been expected. The remoteness principle is used to resolve thin skull cases. A thin skull case occurs if the plaintiff was unusually vulnerable to injury. In a literal example, suppose I am injury-prone because my skull is very thin. If you carelessly hit me on the head with a stick, are you responsible for all of my losses? What if a normal person would not have suffered any injury? What if a normal person would have suffered a minor injury, but not one as serious as mine? The law tries to strike a balance between its desire to compensate me and its desire to treat you fairly. You are not responsible at all if a normal person would not have suffered any harm. But you are fully responsible for all of my losses if it was reasonably foreseeable that a normal person would have suffered some damage. 381 For instance, if your carelessness would have bruised a normal person, I can fully recover for the fact that I also suffered brain damage. 382 Significantly for business people, the courts traditionally refused to apply a thin wallet principle. The defendant was not responsible for the fact that the plaintiff suffered to an unusual extent because the victim was poor. Today, however, the courts will hold the defendant fully liable if it was reasonably foreseeable that the plaintiff's poverty would cause it to suffer more than usual. 383 Business Decision 6.2 explores those issues.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
It seems like youre summarizing legal principles regarding foreseea... View the full answer
Related Book For
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these law questions
-
The Crazy Eddie fraud may appear smaller and gentler than the massive billion-dollar frauds exposed in recent times, such as Bernie Madoffs Ponzi scheme, frauds in the subprime mortgage market, the...
-
Children's Hospital & Clinics COO Julie Morath set out to change the culture by instituting a policy of blameless reporting, which encourages employees to report anything that goes wrong or seems...
-
West State Furniture (WSF) manufactures desks and desk chairs using two departments within a single facility. The West Department produces the desks, and the State Department produces the chairs. WSF...
-
Consider the application of the Dittus-Boelter relation [Equation (6-4a)] to turbulent flow of air in a smooth tube under developed turbulent flow conditions. For a fixed mass flow rate and tube...
-
According to a survey of business firms in a certain city, 750 firms offer their employees health insurance, 640 offer dental insurance, and 280 offer health insurance and dental insurance. How many...
-
Discounts and returns Non-GST version Ashleas Importers sells home decor with credit terms of 2/15, n/30. A trade discount of 25% is given to purchases made by wholesalers. On 3 March 2025, Johnson...
-
The distance from Potsdam to larger markets and limited air service have hindered the town in attracting new industry. Air Express, a major overnight delivery service, is considering establishing a...
-
Assume the export price of a Nissan car from Japan is Yen 3,000,000. The exchange rate is Yen 122.00/$. A forecast on inflation in the USA is 2% and 0% in Japan per annum. Assuming purchasing power...
-
Wacky Wendy produces gourmet cheese in Wisconsin. Wendy has sales as follows: Wendys Sales: State Sales Iowa $ 350,530 Michigan $ 134,643 Minnesota $ 849,190 Wisconsin $ 1,323,140 Totals $ 2,657,503...
-
Glenda Biggers was the sole shareholder and corporate secretary and Alton Biggers was the president of Clark Warehouses. In January 1993, Clark Warehouses executed a note to the Small Business...
-
cell before his work shift. A few items remained in his old cell: a pair of Adidas shoes, some electronic equipment, and some food. Melvin hid the property and asked the guard to deadlock the cell....
-
Jose Casillas and Robert Houle purchased an older home that had been divided into apartment units. Their initial plan was to renovate and resell the home, but they decided instead to keep it and...
-
Ganci filed a lawsuit against Townsend in July 2010 alleging sexual harassment and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Gancis claims were based, in part, on an alleged sexual assault in the...
-
Larry Henley received Lot 6-A in Soldotna, Alaska, as a gift in 2001. The parcel was a treed lot with no improvements. Lot 6-B was adjacent and directly south of Lot 6-A. Later that year, Henley...
-
Are the servant and authentic forms of leadership a trend or a fad in organizations and why? Will these trends (Fads) for servant and/or authentic leadership growth continue in organizations? Why or...
-
(a) What is the focal length of a magnifying glass that gives an angular magnification of 8.0 when the image is at infinity? (b) How far must the object be from the lens?
-
When facilitating the methylation or pseudouridylation of an rRNA, a snoRNA functions as a. a decoy. b. a scaffold. c. a guide. d. both b and c.
-
Suppose that the overexpression of a particular miRNA was associated with pancreatic cancer. Which of the following agents might be effective in treating this type of cancer? a. Enoxacin b. A DNA...
-
When an ncRNA functions as a decoy, it a. contains binding sites for many different proteins, thereby promoting the formation of a large complex. b. recognizes other ncRNAs and sequesters them,...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App