The figure below is an interesting take, comparing the differences between traditional and agile project management in the context of the scope triangle. Traditional Agile Fixed Requirements Resources Time Value Driven Plan Driven Estimated Resources Time Features Discuss briefly how the figure points to key differences in how these styles of project management play out in practice. How do these portrayals capture what the respective project management priorities are, and which aspects drive others. (NOTE: "Discuss" is different from "describe." Don't simply describe what you see in the figure and stop there. For example: "In traditional project management, requirements are fixed; in agile, resources and time are fixed." That is a description. We can see that for ourselves in the figure. It is fine to make that type of observation, but go to the next level and interpret meaning, perhaps putting it into the context of real-world practice.)