The following question concerns a famous case$-$study in the literature, the so$-$called Incident at Morales case. Fred is a young chemical engineer who has been hired to design and supervise the construction of a chemical plant in Mexico for the company Phaust. During the design and construction, he encounters cases in which safety measures are compromised due to budget concerns. Wally is Fred's boss, and Chuck is Wally's boss. Consider a number of decisions and actions described below. Which one illustrates concept of "normalizing deviance"?

The decision to use the cheaper couplings in the production process. even though initial tests at lower temperature and pressure had already shown some minor coupling failures.

Refusing to abide by the environmental regulations in Mexico, even when Wally warned him that he did not want to get into trouble with Mexican authorities.

Accepting the new job with Phaust, even though his wife wamed him that it would produce troubling dilemmas for him.

None of the above.